##plugins.themes.huaf_theme.article.main##
Abstract
This study was investigated the current status of rice straw management and estimated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from post-harvest practices in Phu Vang commune, Hue City, Vietnam– during the 2024–2025 winter–spring season. Field surveys were conducted across multiple communes with 30 rice-farming households using randomised sampling to assess typical straw management practices such as open-field burning, incorporating into soil, composting, and reusing for mushroom cultivation or livestock feeding. Data were analysed to estimate straw production, burning rates, and corresponding GHG emissions using established emission factors. Survey data from local households indicated that livestock feed was the most common straw management method (83.33%), while open-field burning remained a significant concern, with 40% of households still engaging in this practice. The study found a strong correlation between straw biomass and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The amount of straw generated varied from 7.8 to 12.2 t/ha/season across different study sites. Consequently, GHG emissions from straw burning also showed significant variation, with estimated emissions of CO2 ranging from 4.1 to 6.7 t/ha/season. A positive correlation was observed between the quantity of straw burned and the level of emissions, confirming the environmental impact of current practices. This research contributed empirical data to the assessment of GHG emissions from rice cultivation in research sites and reinforced the need for sustainable straw management policies.
##plugins.themes.huaf_theme.article.details##
References
Hoàng Anh Lê, Nguyễn Thị Thu Hạnh, Lê Thùy Linh. (2013). Ước tính lượng khí phát thải do đốt rơm rạ tại đồng ruộng trên địa bàn tỉnh Thái Bình. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học quốc gia Hà Nội: Các Khoa học Trái đất và Môi trường, 29(2), 26–33.
Nguyễn Thị Hồng Điệp, Nguyễn Văn Hoàng Thanh, Đỗ Minh Mẫn, Nguyễn Trọng Nguyễn và Nguyễn Hồ. (2024). Ước tính lượng phát thải khí nhà kính từ lĩnh vực nông nghiệp – Trường hợp nghiên cứu tại quận Ô Môn, thành phố Cần Thơ. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Đồng Tháp, 13(2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.13.2.2024.1229
Trần Sỹ Nam, Kjeld Ingvorsen, Lê Hoàng Việt, Nguyễn Thị Huỳnh Như, Nguyễn Hữu Chiếm và Nguyễn Võ Châu Ngân. (2014). Ước tính lượng và các biện pháp xử lý rơm rạ ở một số tỉnh đồng bằng sông Cửu Long. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Cần Thơ – Phần A: Khoa học Tự nhiên, Công nghệ và Môi trường, 32, 87–93.
Trần Thị Mil, Phạm Nguyễn Minh Trung và Võ Thị Gương. (2012). Hiệu quả xử lý rơm rạ và phân hữu cơ trong cải thiện độ phì nhiêu đất và năng suất lúa tại Châu Thành Hậu Giang. Tạp chí Khoa học, 22a, 253–260.
Trần Xuân Dũng, Nguyễn Huỳnh Thy. (2022). Ước tính lượng khí phát thải do đốt rơm rạ trên đồng ruộng tại khu vực Đồng bằng sông Cửu Long. Tạp chí Khí tượng Thủy văn Việt Nam, 736(4), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.36335/VNJHM.2022(736).25-35
Dobermann, A., & Fairhurst, T. H. (2002, May). Rice straw management. Better Crops International, 16 (Special Supplement), 7–11. Potash & Phosphate Institute.
Gadde, B., Bonnet, S., Menke, C., & Garivait, S. (2009). Air pollutant emissions from rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand, and the Philippines. Environmental Pollution, 157(5), 1554–1558. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.01.004
Hoang Thi Hue, Nguyen Van Hieu, Nguyen Thi Hong Hanh, Bui Thi Thu Trang, & Nguyen Thị Hoài Thương. (2024). The state of greenhouse gas emissions in some fields of the agricultural sector in Hanoi. Vietnam Journal of Science, Technology and Engineering, 66(10), 69–75. https://doi.org/ 10.31276/VJST.66(10).69-75
Hou, J., Yu, C., Xu, Y., Li, H., Cai, A., Ye, M., Ma, Z., Cui, G., & Zhu, J. (2023). Reimagining carbon emission mitigation in sustainable agriculture: Uncovering farmers’ propensity for straw recycling. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1288763. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1288763
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2019). 2019 refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: Volume 4—Agriculture, forestry and other land use (Eds. E. Calvo Buendia, K. Tanabe, A. Kranjc, J. Baasansuren, M. Fukuda, S. Ngarize, A. Osako, Y. Pyrozhenko, P. Shermanau, & S. Federici). IPCC.
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2019-refinement-to-the-2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories.
Justin, A., Kristine, S. P., Ryan, R. R., Mai, V. T., Tran, V. T., Nguyen, V. H., Bjoern, O. S., & Pauline, C. (2020). Rice straw management effects on greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options. In M. Gummert, N. Hung, P. Chivenge, & B. Douthwaite (Eds.), Sustainable rice straw management (pp. 163–190). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32373-8_9
Li, P., Zhang, A., Huang, S., Han, J., Jin, X., Shen, X., Hussain, Q., Wang, X., Zhou, J., & Chen, Z. (2023). Optimizing management practices under straw regimes for global sustainable agricultural production. Agronomy, 13, 710. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/agronomy13030710
Nguyen, T. K. O. (2021). Rice straw open burning: Emissions, effects and multiple benefits of non-burning alternatives. Vietnam Journal of Science, Technology and Engineering, 63(4), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.31276/VJSTE.63(4).79-85
Nhu, T. P., & Tri, C. D. (2024). Assessment of air pollutant emissions from rice straw open burning in Hoa Vang Commune, Da Nang City, Vietnam. Journal of Science and Technology – The University of Danang, 22(11C), 25–32. https://doi.org/ 10.31130/ud-jst.2024.550E
Pham, C.T., Boongla, Y., Nghiem, T.D., Huu, T.L., Ning,T., Akira,T.& Kazuichi,H. (2019). Emission characteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from open burning of rice straw in the north of Vietnam. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132343
Truong, T. D. H., Tran, T. D., & Hoang, T. T. T. H. (2023). Situation of crop residues reuse and paddy soil characteristics in Quang Dien commune, Thua Thien Hue province. Hue University Journal of Science: Agriculture and Rural Development, 132(3B), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijard.v132i3B.7188